Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2004-MO-017 - Carr v. Passailaigue

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court


David Carr,        Appellant,

v.

Ernest Passailaigue,        Respondent.


ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI


Appeal From Charleston County
R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court Judge


Memorandum Opinion No. 2004-MO-017
Heard April 7, 2004 - Filed April 12, 2004


AFFIRMED IN RESULT


Chalmers Carey Johnson, of Chalmers Johnson Law Firm, of Charleston, for Appellant.

Charles E. Carpenter, S. Elizabeth Brosnan, and Anthony E. Rebollo, of Richardson, Plowden, Carpenter & Robinson, P.A., of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Affirmed in result pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), and the following authorities:  Issue 1:  Our resolution of Issues 2 and 3 makes it unnecessary to address this issue on appeal.   Issue 2Dean v. Ruscon Corp., 321 S.C. 360, 468 S.E.2d 645 (1996).  Issue 3I’On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. Pleasant, 338 S.C. 406, 526 S.E.2d 716 (2000) (appellate court may review respondent’s additional reasons and if convinced it is proper may rely on them, or any other reason in the record, and affirm lower court’s judgment).

AFFIRMED IN RESULT.

TOAL, C.J., WALLER, BURNETT, PLEICONES, JJ., and Acting Justice John W. Kittredge, concur.