THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
Boyce Travon Suber Appellant.
Appeal From Greenville County
C. Victor Pyle, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-036
Submitted November 19, 2003 – Filed January 20, 2004
Assistant Appellant Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster; Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh; Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Boyce Travon Suber was indicted of and subsequently convicted of possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute. Suber’s appellate counsel submitted a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating he has reviewed the record and has concluded Suber’s appeal is without merit. Suber did not file a pro se brief with the court.
After a review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on their merits. Accordingly, we dismiss Suber’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. 
HUFF, STILWELL, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
 Because oral argument would not aid the court in resolving the issues on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rules 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.