Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2004-UP-182 - State v. Doby

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State,        Respondent,

v.

Trevor B. Doby,        Appellant.


Appeal From Florence County
James E. Brogdon, Jr., Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-182
Submitted January 29, 2004 – Filed March 17, 2004


APPEAL DISMISSED


Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, all of Columbia;  and  Solicitor Edgar Lewis Clements, III, of Florence, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Trevor B. Doby was indicted for one count of second-degree burglary, one count of grand larceny, two counts of financial transaction card fraud, three counts of financial identity fraud, three counts of financial transaction card theft, and twenty counts of forgery.  Doby pled guilty to two counts of financial transaction card fraud, three counts of financial identity fraud, and fifteen counts of forgery.  He was sentenced to five years imprisonment on each charge, the sentences to run concurrently.  Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Doby’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved.  Doby did not file a pro se response.

After review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Doby’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concurring.


[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving any issue on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.