Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2004-UP-217 - State v. Finley

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State,        Respondent,

v.

Charles Mitchell Finley, Sr.,        Appellant.


Appeal From Greenville County
C. Victor Pyle, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Larry R. Patterson, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-217
Submitted January 29, 2004 – Filed March 30, 2004


APPEAL DISMISSED


Assistant Appellate Defender Tara S. Taggart, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W, McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Charles Mitchell Finley, Sr., was indicted for possession of crack cocaine.  He was convicted and sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment.  Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Finley’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved.  Finley did not file a pro se response.

After review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Finley’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]

GOOLSBY, HUFF, and HOWARD, JJ., concurring.


[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving any issue on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.