Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2004-UP-232 - State v. Phillips

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State,        Respondent,

v.

David Scott Phillips,        Appellant.


 

Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-232
Submitted January 29, 2004 – Filed March 31, 2004


APPEAL DISMISSED


Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Deputy Director for Legal Services, Teresa A. Knox; Legal Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr.; Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, S.C. Dept. of Probation, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: David Scott Phillips was convicted of second-degree burglary and grand larceny.  On the burglary conviction, the circuit court sentenced Phillips to six years imprisonment suspended on the service of five years probation.  On the grand larceny conviction, he was sentenced to three years imprisonment suspended on the service of five years probation, with both of these sentences to run concurrently.  Subsequently, Phillips violated his probation and the six year suspended sentence was revoked in full.  Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Phillips’ counsel attached a petition to be relieved.  Phillips did not file a pro se response.

After review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Phillips’ appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concurring.


[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving any issue on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.