Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2004-UP-311 - State v. Barnhill

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jason Barnhill, Appellant.


Appeal From Williamsburg County
Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-311
Submitted February 20, 2004 – Filed May 7, 2004


APPEAL DISMISSED


Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, all of Columbia; and  Solicitor Cecil Kelley Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Jason Barnhill pled guilty to robbery and was sentenced to seven years imprisonment.  Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Barnhill’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Barnhill did not file a pro se response.

After review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Barnhill’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concurring.


[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving any issue on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.