Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2004-UP-384 - State v. Johnson

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State,        Respondent,

v.

Charles F. Johnson,        Appellant.


Appeal From Georgetown County
James E. Lockemy, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-384
Submitted April 21, 2004 – Filed June 18, 2004


APPEAL DISMISSED


Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor J. Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.


PER CURIAM:  Charles F. Johnson was convicted of second-degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor, lewd act on a minor, and contributing to the delinquency of a minor.  The circuit court sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment for second-degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor, eight years imprisonment for lewd act on a minor, and three years imprisonment for contributing to the delinquency of a minor, the sentences to run concurrently.  Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Johnson’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved.  Johnson did not file a pro se response.

After review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Johnson’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and BEATTY, JJ., concurring.


[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving any issue on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.