Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2004-UP-387 - State v. Dickerson

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239)d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State,        Respondent,

v.

Joseph Lee Dickerson,        Appellant.


Appeal From Richland County
Edward B. Cottingham, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-387
Submitted April 21, 2004 – Filed June 18, 2004


APPEAL DISMISED


Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia;  and Socicitor Warren Blair Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Joseph Dickerson appeals his conviction on a charge of trafficking in cocaine more than ten grams but less than twenty-eight grams. Counsel for Dickerson attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel. Dickerson did not file a separate pro se response. 

After a review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Dickerson’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.