THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
In the Interest of: Joshua H., a Minor under the Age of Seventeen, Appellant,
Appeal From Horry County
Lisa A. Kinon, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-418
Submitted April 21, 2004 – Filed June 25, 2004
Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda H. Haile, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor J. Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Joshua H. appeals the revocation of his probation. Counsel for Joshua H. attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel. Joshua H. did not file a separate pro se brief.
After a review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on their merits. Accordingly, we dismiss Joshua H.’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved. 
GOOLSBY, HOWARD and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
 Because oral argument would not aid the court in resolving the issues on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rules 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.