Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2004-UP-441 - State v. Robinson
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Joe Lewis Robinson, Appellant.


Appeal From Hampton County
 Perry M. Buckner, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-441
Submitted July 7, 2004 – Filed August 23, 2004


APPEAL DISMISSED


Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster,  Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh,  Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Randolph  Murdaugh, III, of Hampton, for Respondent.


PER CURIAM:  Joe Lewis Robinson appeals his conviction for armed robbery, arguing the trial court erred in allowing the victim to identify him as the culprit.  Specifically, Robinson argues the court erred by allowing the solicitor to elicit testimony from the victim that the victim picked Robinson out of a photo-lineup two days after the robbery.  Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Robinson’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved, stating he has reviewed the record and concluded the appeal lacks merit.  Robinson filed a separate pro se brief which we have considered.  After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved. 

APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]

HEARN, C.J., HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.



[1]        We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.