THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD
NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
Savannah C. Grant, Appellant,
Appeal From Greenville County
John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-517
Submitted October 1, 2004 – Filed October 14, 2004
Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville;,for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Savannah Grant appeals her conviction for assault and battery with intent to kill. Grant argues the trial court erred in denying her motion for a directed verdict. Grant’s counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that she had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit. Grant filed a separate pro se brief and supplemental briefs alleging various errors on the part of the trial court, the police department, and her defense attorney. After a thorough review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Grant’s pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss  Grant’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.
HEARN, C.J., HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.