Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2005-UP-026 - State v. Luckett

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Nathan Luckett, Appellant.


Appeal From Orangeburg County
 Edward B. Cottingham, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No.  2005-UP-026
Submitted January 1, 2005 – Filed January 13, 2005


APPEAL DISMISSED


Assistant Appellate Defender Tara S. Taggart, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry D. McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Walter M. Bailey, Jr., of Summerville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Nathan Luckett was indicted for armed robbery, carjacking, and kidnapping.  The jury found him guilty of all charges.  The trial court sentenced him to concurrent sentences of life in prison without the possibility of parole on all of the charges, pursuant to South Carolina Code Annotated section 17-25-45 (2003 & Supp. 2003), as Luckett had two prior convictions for armed robbery.  Luckett’s counsel attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel stating she had reviewed the record and concluded the appeal lacked merit.  Luckett did not file a pro se response.  After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, KITTREDGE, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.