THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(1), SCACR.
THE STATE OF
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
Alonzo Bailey, Appellant.
James R. Barber, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-265
Submitted March 1, 2005 – Filed April 8, 2005
Assistant Appellate Defender Tara S. Taggart, of
Columbia for Appellant.
Teresa A. Knox, Tommy Evans, Jr., J. Benjamin Aplin, all of
Columbia for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Alonzo Bailey appeals arguing the trial judge abused his discretion in revoking his probation. Bailey’s counsel attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating she had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit. After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.
HEARN, C.J. and KITTREDGE and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.