THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(1), SCACR.
THE STATE OF
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
Lucille Coleman, Appellant.
James R. Barber, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-266
Submitted March 1, 2005 – Filed April 8, 2005
Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Teresa A. Knox, Tommy Evans, Jr., and J. Benjamin Aplin, all of
Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Lucille Coleman appeals the trial court’s revocation of her probation, arguing her due process rights were violated because no preliminary hearing was held. Coleman’s counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating he believes the appeal has no merit. Coleman did not file a pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.
HEARN, C.J., and KITTREDGE and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.