Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2005-UP-411 - Carolina First v. I. G. W. T. Limousine

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Carolina First Bank, as Successor to Rock Hill Bank and Trust,        Respondent,

v.

I.G.W.T. Limousine, Inc. and Fundador Roman and Mary Susan Roman,        Appellants.


Appeal From York County
S. Jackson Kimball, III, Special Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-411
Submitted June 1, 2005 – Filed June 27, 2005


AFFIRMED


Jeffrey Falkner Wilkes, of Greenville, for Appellants.

Sarah E. Day and Sandi R. Wilson, both of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: I.G.W.T. Limousine, Inc., Fundador Roman, and Mary Susan Roman appeal from the grant of summary judgment to Carolina First Bank, as Successor to Rock Hill Bank and Trust.  We affirm 1 pursuant to Rule 220, SCACR, and the following authorities:  Wilder Corp. v. Wilke, 330 S.C. 71, 76, 497 S.E.2d 731, 733 (1998) (β€œIt is axiomatic that an issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial judge to be preserved for appellate review.”); Summer v. Carpenter, 328 S.C. 36, 43, 492 S.E.2d 55, 58 (1997) (stating that where trial judge did not rule on issue at trial and party did not make a Rule 59, SCRCP, motion for a ruling, issue is not preserved for appellate review).

AFFIRMED.

GOOLSBY, HUFF, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur. 


1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.