THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
James Edgar Hutchinson, Appellant.
B. Hicks Harwell, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-532
Submitted September 1, 2005 – Filed September 20, 2005
Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster; Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh; Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott; Sr. Assistant Attorney General Harold M. Coombs, Jr., Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar Lewis Clements, III, of Florence, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Pursuant to a negotiated plea,
We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Gentry, 363 S.C. 93, 103, 910 S.E.2d 494, 500 (2005) (holding that issues concerning the sufficiency of an indictment are not issues of subject matter jurisdiction); State v. Rogers, 361 S.C. 178, 183, 603 S.E.2d 910, 912-13 (Ct. App. 2004) (holding that an issue must be raised to and ruled upon by the trial judge in order to be preserved for appellate review); State v. Thompson, 341 S.C. 524, 526, 534 S.E.2d 708, 710 (Ct. App. 2000) (“A guilty plea generally acts as a waiver of all non-jurisdictional defects and defenses.”).
GOOLSBY, BEATTY, and SHORT, JJ., concur.
 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.