THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
Amy Hutto, Appellant.
Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-611
Submitted December 1, 2005 – File December 8, 2005
Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Legal Director Teresa A. Knox, Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, and Legal Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr., all of
Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Amy Hutto appeals the revocation of her probation and sentence of eighteen months. Hutto alleges the revoking court abused its discretion in revoking her probation. After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Hutto’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.
GOOLSBY, ANDERSON, and SHORT, JJ., concur.
 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.