THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
Fred Henry McClure Appellant.
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2006-UP-061
Submitted January 3, 2006 – Filed January 26, 2006
Assistant Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, Office of Appellate Defense, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Assistant Chief Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of
Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Fred Henry McClure appeals the revocation of his probation. McClure argues there was not a sufficient factual basis to revoke his probation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1976), appellate counsel has petitioned to be removed stating that after reviewing the record the appeal was without merit. After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss appellant’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.
HEARN, C.J., and HUFF and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.