Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2007-UP-069 - State v. Upson
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS 
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Charles Upson, Appellant.


Appeal From Aiken County
 Reginald I. Lloyd, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-069
Submitted January 2, 2007 – Filed February 12, 2007   


APPEAL DISMISSED


Assistant Appellate Defender Tara S. Taggart, for Appellant.

Teresa A. Knox and J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Charles Upson appeals the revocation of his probation.  His counsel contends the trial court erred in failing to grant Upson’s motion for directed verdict on the burglary charge, which served as the grounds for the revocation.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Upson’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., and KITTREDGE and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.