Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2007-UP-282 - State v. Lee

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Garry David Lee, II, Appellant.


Appeal From Spartanburg County
 J. Mark Hayes, II, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No.2007-UP-282
Submitted May 1, 2007 – Filed June 6, 2007   


APPEAL DISMISSED


Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Appellant, Garry David Lee, II, pled guilty to first-degree burglary, second-degree burglary, safecracking, grand larceny of between $1,000 and $5,000, grand larceny of more than $5,000, and arson.  {R. 3, 12-13, 47-60}  The trial judge sentenced him to concurrent terms of twenty-five years each on the arson, safecracking, and first-degree burglary charges, and ten years for grand larceny of greater than $5,000,  five years for grand larceny between $1,000 and $5,000, and fifteen years for second-degree burglary. {R. 23, 49, 52, 55, 58, 59, 60}  Lee’s counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that she had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit.  Lee did not file a separate pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, HUFF, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.