THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
Eugene Lamont Rhodes, Appellant.
Appeal From Williamsburg County
Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge
Submitted September 1, 2007 – Filed September 28, 2007
Aileen P. Clare, Appellate Defender, of Columbia; for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, of Columbia; and C. Kelly Jackson, Solicitor, of Sumter, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Eugene Lamont Rhodes appeals his convictions for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute, and possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute within proximity of a public park, arguing the trial court erred in not granting his motion for a directed verdict. After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Rhodes’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.
HEARN, C.J., and HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.