Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2008-UP-277 - Holland v. Holland

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Renee McDuffie Holland, Respondent,

v.

Wells McManus Holland, Appellant.


Appeal From Aiken County
 Henry T. Woods, Family Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-277
Submitted May 1, 2008 – Filed May 27, 2008


AFFIRMED


Wells McManus Holland, of Wagener, pro se.

Charles D. Lee, III, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Wells Holland appeals the family court’s grant of a divorce to Renee Holland on the grounds of one year separation, sole custody of their children, and periodic alimony and child support of $750.00 and $675.00 a month, respectively.  We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(2), SCACR, and the following authorities:  11 U.S.C.A. §1301 (2004) (stating a creditor may not act or commence any civil action to collect debt of the debtor, unless the case is dismissed); Nelson vs. QHG of S.C., Inc., 362 S.C. 421, 608 S.E.2d 855 (2005) (finding the remedy for inadequate representation is a malpractice action against the former attorney); and Floyd v. Floyd, 365 S.C. 56, 615 S.E.2d 465 (Ct. App. 2005) (holding an issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial court in order to be preserved for appellate review).

Accordingly, the family court’s order is

AFFIRMED.[1]

HEARN, C.J., and SHORT, J., and KONDUROS, J., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.