Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2008-UP-288 - SC DSS v. Timothy E.

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals\

South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

Timothy E., Katina E., Hope M. and Brenda L., Defendants,

Of Whom Timothy E. and Katina E. are the Appellants.

In the interests of:  A.P., DOB: 06/08/1990; T.E., DOB: 11/16/1992 A.E., DOB: 1/13/1995; all minors under the age of 18.


Appeal from Aiken County
 Kellum W. Allen, Family Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-288
Submitted June 1, 2008 – Filed June 4, 2008


AFFIRMED


Jeffrey Raymond Moorehead and Timothy E., both of Aiken, for Appellant Timothy E.

Charles Collins Mayers, of Augusta and Katina E., of Aiken, for Appellant Katina E.

Dennis M. Gmerek, of Aiken, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Timothy E. and Katina E. appeal a family court order issued subsequent to an intervention hearing.  After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987) and S.C. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Frederick Downer, Sr., S.C.Sup.Ct. Order dated February 2, 2005 (expanding the procedure set forth in Cauthen to situations where an indigent person appeals from an order imposing other measures short of termination of parental rights), we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.[1]

HEARN, C.J., KONDUROS, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.