Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2009-UP-181 - State v. Eigner

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Keith Eigner, Appellant.

 


Appeal From Union County
Lee S. Alford, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No.  2009-UP-181
Submitted April 1, 2009 – Filed April 30, 2009 


APPEAL DISMISSED


Appellate Defender, Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Keith Eigner appeals his convictions for possession with intent to distribute (PWID) crack cocaine, PWID cocaine, and possession of marijuana, and concurrent sentences of twenty years, twenty years, and one year, respectively.  Eigner's counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing the trial court erred in refusing to suppress evidence obtained via execution of a search warrant based on false information.  Eigner also filed a pro se brief reasserting his counsel's briefed argument as well as numerous other arguments.  After a thorough review of the record and both briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur. 


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.