Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2009-UP-430 - Servicemaster v. Harriett

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

PF&H Inc., d/b/a Servicemaster of Charleston, Respondent,

v.

Jill E. Harriett, n/k/a Jill E. Bell, Roger L. Harriett, Billy Lee Harriett, Loretta R. Harriett, and Enterprise Bank of South Carolina, Defendants,

of whom Roger L. Harriett, Billy Lee Harriett, and Loretta R. Harriett are the Appellants.


Appeal From Colleton County
Roger M. Young, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-430
Submitted September 1, 2009 – Filed September 8, 2009


AFFIRMED


Roger L. Harriett, Billy Lee Harriett, and Loretta R. Harriett, all of Lodge, for Appellants. 

Zachary J. Closser, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Roger L. Harriett, Billy Lee Harriett, and Loretta R. Harriett (the Harrietts) appeal the circuit court's judgment against them.   On appeal, the Harrietts argue the circuit court erred in finding the service contract and mechanic's lien are enforceable against them.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority:  In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of McCracken, 346 S.C. 87, 92, 551 S.E.2d 235, 238 (2001) (holding an issue is deemed abandoned on appeal if the argument in the brief is not supported by authority or is only conclusory). 

AFFIRMED.

HEARN, C.J., and KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.