Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2009-UP-532 - The State v. Bryan Hackett

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Bryan Orlando Hackett, Appellant.


Appeal From Greenwood County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-532
Submitted November 2, 2009 – Filed November 19, 2009   


APPEAL DISMISSED


Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Bryan Orlando Hackett appeals his probation revocation and resulting concurrent two-year sentences.  Hackett argues the probation revocation was so summary that the record is insufficient for review.    After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Hackett's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur. 


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.