Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2010-UP-184 - State v. Cameron

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Joshua James Cameron, Appellant.


Appeal From York County
 John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-184
Submitted March 1, 2010 – Filed March 2, 2010  


AFFIRMED


Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

John Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Joshua James Cameron appeals the imposition of global positioning satellite monitoring following the revocation of his probation, arguing the circuit court erred in hearing the State's motion to reconsider, which was filed after the expiration of the term of court during which Cameron's probation was revoked.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities:  Rule 29(a), SCRCrimP (permitting a party to a criminal action to file post-trial motions within ten days from the date sentence was imposed, and exempting hearing of such motions from the rule that criminal matters may not be heard after the end of the term of court during which judgment was rendered); State v. Campbell, 376 S.C. 212, 215, 656 S.E.2d 371, 373 (2008) (recognizing Rule 29(a), SCRCrimP, enunciates two exceptions to the general rule that the circuit court "is without jurisdiction to consider a criminal matter once the term of court during which judgment was entered expires"). 

AFFIRMED.

PIEPER and GEATHERS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.