Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2010-UP-221 - State v. Williams

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Charles Williams, Appellant.


Appeal From Oconee County
 Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No.  2010-UP-221
Submitted  March 1,2010 – Filed March 29, 2010


Affirmed


Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Assistant Attorney General Michelle J. Parsons, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Christina T. Adams, of Anderson, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Charles Williams appeals his convictions for second degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor and lewd act upon a minor.  Williams argues the trial court erred in allowing the admission of his statement indicating he fondled and rubbed the victim.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: State v. Burton, 326 S.C. 605, 613, 486 S.E.2d 762, 765 (Ct. App. 1997) (finding in camera admissibility ruling insufficient to preserve issue for appeal where testimony from two witnesses was presented, a break was taken after the ruling and before the testimony at issue was presented, and defendant failed to contemporaneously object). 

Affirmed.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and lOCKEMY, jj., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.