Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2010-UP-222 - State v. Shaw

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Dustin Olin Shaw, Appellant.


Appeal From Lexington County
James W. Johnson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-222
Submitted March 1, 2010 – Filed March 29, 2010


Affirmed


Benjamin A. Stitely, of Lexington, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Senior Assistant Attorney General Norman Mark Rapoport, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dustin Olin Shaw appeals his convictions for second-degree sexual exploitation of a minor.  Shaw argues the trial court erred in allowing the admission of his written statement admitting he downloaded and kept child pornography on his computer.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: State v. Bailey, 298 S.C. 1, 5-6, 377 S.E.2d 581, 584 (1989) (finding an issue unpreserved where appellant argued one ground at trial and an alternative ground on appeal).

Affirmed.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.