Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2010-UP-243 - State v. Scott

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Teran Scott, Appellant.


Appeal From Richland County
 L. Casey Manning, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No.  2010-UP-243
Submitted April 1,2010 – Filed April 19, 2010


APPEAL DISMISSED


Appellate Defender LaNelle C. DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Assistant Deputy Attorney General Henry Dagan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Teran Scott appeals his guilty plea to attempted armed robbery, assault and battery with the intent to kill, kidnapping, six counts of armed robbery, assault while resisting arrest, three counts of assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature, two counts of first-degree burglary, assault with intent to kill, and murder pursuant to N.C. v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970).  Scott argues his plea did not comply with the mandates of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969).   After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.