Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2010-UP-457 - State v. Inman

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Quinton Inman, Appellant.


Appeal From Marion County
 Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-457
Submitted October 1, 2010 – Filed October 21, 2010   


APPEAL DISMISSED


Senior Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia; and Quinton Inman, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar Lewis Clements, III, of Florence, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Quinton Inman was convicted of murder and sentenced to life without parole.  Inman appeals, arguing the trial court committed reversible error in failing to instruct the jury on the law of accessory after the fact.  Inman filed a pro se brief, arguing the trial court erred by (1) making comments on the credibility of the witnesses during jury instructions and (2) instructing jurors on the "hand of one is the hand of all" theory.  After a thorough review of the record and both briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., HUFF and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.