Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2010-UP-474 - Lindsey, Roy v. SCDC

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Roy Lindsey, Appellant,

v.

South Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondent.


Appeal From Administrative Law Court
Ralph K. Anderson, III, Administrative Law Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-474
Submitted October 1, 2010 – Filed October 28, 2010


AFFIRMED


Roy Lindsey, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Christopher D. Florian, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Roy Lindsey appeals the Administrative Law Court's dismissal of his appeal regarding the loss of his good time credits after a disciplinary conviction.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities:  Rule 220(c), SCACR ("The appellate court may affirm any ruling, order, decision or judgment upon any ground(s) appearing in the Record on Appeal."); Plum Creek Dev. Co. v. City of Conway,  334 S.C. 30, 34, 512 S.E.2d 106, 109 (1999) ("Res judicata bars subsequent actions by the same parties when the claims arise out of the same transaction or occurrence that was the subject of a prior action between those parties.").

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J., SHORT and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.