Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2010-UP-494 - State v. Bradley

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Nathaniel Noel Bradley, Appellant.


Appeal From Sumter County
 Ralph F. Cothran, Jr., Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No.  2010-UP-494
Submitted November 1, 2010 – Filed November 8, 2010


AFFIRMED


Senior Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, and Assistant Attorney General William Edgar Salter, III, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Cecil Kelly Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Nathaniel Noel Bradley appeals his murder conviction and thirty-year sentence, arguing the trial court erred in denying his directed verdict motion.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority:  State v. Zeigler, 364 S.C. 94, 103, 610 S.E.2d 859, 863 (Ct. App. 2005) ("The appellate court may reverse the trial judge's denial of a motion for a directed verdict only if there is no evidence to support the judge's ruling."); Id. at 103, 610 S.E.2d at 864 ("Any person who is present at a homicide, aiding and abetting, is guilty of the homicide as a principal, even though another does the killing.").

AFFIRMED.

HUFF, KONDUROS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.