THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent,
Dalquana L., Loresa D., Tommy D., and Penny D., Defendants,
Of whom Dalquana L. is the Appellant.
In the interest of one minor child.
Appeal From Chesterfield County
Roger E. Henderson, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-514
Submitted November 1, 2010 – Filed November 23, 2010
Williams Hubbard and Emma T. Dean, both of Columbia, for Appellant.
Elizabeth Biggerstaff York, of Hartsville, for Respondent.
C. Heath Ruffner, of Cheraw, for Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Dalquana L. (Mother) appeals from the family court's order for permanency planning granting Tommy D. and Penny D. legal and physical custody of Mother's minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-1700 (2010). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and grant counsel's petition to be relieved.
THOMAS, J., KONDUROS, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.
 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.