Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2011-UP-105 - CitiCorp Trust Bank v. Pugh

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

CitiCorp Trust Bank, FSB, Respondent,

v.

Jason Pugh, Wanda Ham a/k/a Wanda Ham Pugh, Arthur G. Gibbons, and Johnnie B. Gibbons, Defendants,

Of whom Wanda Ham a/k/a Wanda Ham Pugh is the Appellant.


Appeal From Sumter County
Richard Booth, Master-In-Equity


Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-105
Submitted February 1, 2011 – Filed March 15, 2011   


AFFIRMED


Wanda Pugh, of Sumter, pro se.

Stephen M. Cox and David C. Kimball, both of Rock Hill, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Wanda Pugh appeals the master's order for foreclosure and sale of her home in Sumter County.  Pugh's brief contains no specific arguments of error by the master.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities:  S.C. Dep't of Transp. v. First Carolina Corp. of S.C., 372 S.C. 295, 301-02, 641 S.E.2d 903, 907 (2007) (holding in order for an issue to be preserved for appellate review, it must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial judge); see also First Sav. Bank v. McLean, 314 S.C. 361, 363, 444 S.E.2d 513, 514 (1994) (stating an issue is deemed abandoned and will not be considered on appeal if "[a]ppellant fails to provide arguments or supporting authority for his assertion"). 

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J., KONDUROS, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to rule 215, SCACR.