Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2011-UP-420 - Roe v. SCDSS

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

John Roe and Jane Roe, Respondents,

v.

South Carolina Department
of Social Services, Lisa S.,
Edward C., Ray H., Michael C., Pedro A.V., and John Doe, Defendants,

Of whom Lisa S. is theAppellant.

In the interest of a minor child under the age of 18.


Appeal From Greenville County
Rochelle Y. Conits, Family Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-420
Submitted September 1, 2011 – Filed September 9, 2011   


AFFIRMED


Andrew R. Havran, of Greer, for Appellant.

Vanessa Kormylo, of Greenville, for Respondents.

Robert A. Clark, of Greenville, for Guardian ad Litem.

Deborah Murdock, of Mauldin, for South Carolina Department of Social Services.

PER CURIAM: Lisa S. appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor child.  See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010).  Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of facts and conclusions of law, pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.  Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.[1]

HUFF, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.