Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2011-UP-446 - State v. Sullivan

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jaques Jamar Sullivan, Appellant.


Appeal From Greenville County
 Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-446
Submitted October 1, 2011 – Filed October 11, 2011   


AFFIRMED


J. Falkner Wilkes, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Christina Catoe, all of Columbia; and Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Jaques Jamar Sullivan appeals his conviction for trafficking cocaine, possession of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime, and simple possession of marijuana, arguing the trial court erred in admitting evidence obtained by a defective search warrant.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority:  State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 693-94 (2003) (stating an issue is preserved for appellate review when it was raised to and ruled upon by the trial court and when the ground presented to the trial court was the same as the ground argued on appeal).

AFFIRMED.

HUFF, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.