Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Site Map | Feedback
2011-UP-540 - Vessell v. Knagenhjelm

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

George Vessell, Appellant,

v.

Jane M. Knagenhjelm, personally; The Estate of Ludvig Knagenhjelm; the Unknown Heirs of Ludvig Knagenhjelm; Jane M. Knagenhjelm, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ludvig Knagenhjelm and Kathy Knagenhjelm, Respondents.


Appeal from Dorchester County
James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-540 
Submitted November 1, 2011 – Filed December 5, 2011


APPEAL DISMISSED


George Vessell, pro se, of Summerville.

Christopher David Lizzi, of North Charleston, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM:  On appeal, George Vessell asserts multiple issues regarding a circuit court order that memorializes an agreement between Vessell and Jane Knagenhjelm, Kathy Knagenhjelm, and the estate and unknown heirs of Ludvig Knagenhjelm.  We dismiss[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority:  Calcutt v. Calcutt, 282 S.C. 565, 572, 320 S.E.2d 55, 59 (Ct. App. 1984) ("It is well settled an appeal will not be entertained from an order by consent.").

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.