Jennifer A. Jeffrey and Thomas L. Bruce, both of Greenville, for Appellant. Philip James Temple, of Temple and Mann, of Greenville, for Respondent. Kaye Davis, of Greenville, for Defendant. Deborah Murdock, of Murdock Law Firm, LLC, of Mauldin, for Amicus Curiae. Michael Anthony Andrews, of Andrews Law Firm, LLC, of Easley, for Guardian Ad Litem.

Child was removed from her biological mother and placed in foster care. The foster parents filed an action to terminate the mother's parental rights and the family court terminated her parental rights on two grounds: willful failure to visit and Child remaining in foster care for fifteen of the most recent twenty-two months. Mother appeals the termination on the grounds the family court lacked clear and convincing evidence establishing that the statutory prerequisites for termination had been met, erroneously terminated her rights after denying her the right to assistance of counsel, and abused its discretion in permitting a bonding expert to testify who had not been disclosed prior to trial.

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

Appellant argues that the trial court erred in providing a circumstantial evidence jury charge in accordance with State v. Grippon, 327 S.C. 79, 489 S.E.2d 462 (1997). Appellant asserts that the circumstantial evidence charge explained in Grippon is no longer valid in light of this Court's decisions in State v. Bostick, 392 S.C. 134, 708 S.E.2d 774 (2011) and State v. Odems, 395 S.C. 582, 720 S.E.2d 48 (2011), and that the trial court should have provided the circumstantial evidence charge as explained in State v. Edwards, 298 S.C. 272, 379 S.E.2d 888 (1989).

Kenneth C. Anthony, Jr., of The Anthony Law Firm, PA, of Spartanburg, for Petitioner. Kevin Kendrick Bell and Rebecca Ann Roser, both of Robinson McFadden & Moore, PC, of Columbia, for Respondent.

The Court granted certiorari to review a decision by the Court of Appeals interpreting the term "any narcotic" in a life insurance policy.

A. Camden Lewis and Arial Elizabeth King, of Lewis Babcock & Griffin, LLP of Columbia, for Appellants. Elmer Kulmala, of Harvey & Kulmala and James D. Mosteller, III, of The Mosteller Law Firm, LLC, both of Barnwell, for Respondents.

The Court reviews the trial court's order granting Respondents' motion to dismiss.

William Isaac Diggs, of Law Office of William Isaac Diggs, of Myrtle Beach, for Appellant. Vonda Denise Hamilton and Stacy L. Stanley, both of Stanley Law Firm, LLC, of Little River, for Respondent.

The Court reviews the special referee's order denying Appellant's motion for relief from default judgment and stay of a foreclosure sale.

Scott A. Elliott, of Elliott & Elliott, P. A., Charles L.A. Terreni, of Terreni Law Firm, L.L.C., John Marion S. Hoefer and Benjamin Parker Mustian, both of Willoughby & Hoefer, PA, all of Columbia, for Appellant. Charles H. Cook, of Cook Law Firm, Florence P. Belser, Nanette Solveig Edwards, Jeffrey M. Nelson, all of S.C. Office of Regulatory Staff, and Laura Puccia Valtorta, of Valtorta Law Office, all of Columbia, for Respondents.

Carolina Water Service appeals the Public Service Commissions denial of rate relief arguing it erred in basing its decision on purported quality of service concerns.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Petitioner. Joseph M. McCulloch, Jr. and Kathy Ridenoure Schillaci, both of Law Offices of Joseph M. McCulloch, Jr., of Columbia, for Respondent.

The Court granted certiorari in this case to determine whether the court of appeals erred in affirming the magistrate court's decision to dismiss this DUI case under section 56-5-293 of the South Carolina Code because the State failed to produce videotape evidence of the twenty minute pre-test waiting period and the arresting officer terminated the videotape after Petitioner refused the breath test.

Michael Langford Brown, Jr., of Rock Hill and Heath Preston Taylor, of West Columbia, for Petitioner. Solicitor Douglas A. Barfield, Jr., of Lancaster, for Respondent.

This case presents the question of whether there is an exception to the videotaping requirements of section 56-5-2953 of the South Carolina Code where Petitioner refused the breath test.

Gregg E. Meyers, of Jeff Anderson & Assoc. PA, of St Paul, Minnesota, for Appellants. Albert P. Shahid, Jr., of Shahid Law Office, LLC, of Charleston, for Respondents.

Appellants argue the circuit court erred when it dismissed four consolidated cases on the basis the plaintiffs' claims were barred by the settlement of a previous class action.

Henry Pickett Wall and Edward Wade Mullins, III, both of Bruner Powell Wall & Mullins, LLC, of Columbia, for Petitioner. William J. Condon, Jr., of Columbia, for Respondent, Curtis M. Loftis, Jr., and Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, of Columbia, for Respondent, State of South Carolina. William A. Coates and Joseph Owen Smith, both of Roe Cassidy Coates & Price, PA, of Greenville, for Amicus Curiae, State Retirees Association of South Carolina.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus filed in the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court relating to the funding of an investment approved by the South Carolina Retirement System Investment Commission.

John Martin Grantland, Adam J. Neil and Timothy J. Newton, all of Murphy & Grantland, PA, of Columbia, for Appellant. Francis Marion Ervin, II, of Rogers Townsend & Thomas, PC, of Charleston, for Respondent.

Appellant, an automobile insurer, brought this action against Respondent, a Charleston bar, pursuant to South Carolina's Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act following the settlement of an underlying tort lawsuit in the federal district court by an individual against an allegedly underaged patron of the bar (and his parents). The underlying suit alleged the individual was struck when the patron drove into a crowd while leaving the bar in an intoxicated condition. The circuit court denied Appellant's request for contribution and granted summary judgment to Respondent. Appellant now challenges that ruling.

E. J. Westbrook and Catherine H. McElveen, both of Richardson Patrick Westbrook & Brickman, LLC, of Mt. Pleasant, for Appellants. Albert A. Lacour, III, of Clawson & Staubes, LLC, of Charleston, for Respondent.

This is an appeal from the circuit court's order denying Appellants' motion to dismiss and compel arbitration.

Ernest Charles Grose, Jr., of Grose Law Firm, of Greenwood and Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

David L. appeals the family court's order requiring him to register as sex offender for life arguing this imposition violates his rights to due process and equal protection and constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.

Bernard McIntyre, of Beaufort, for Appellant. Charles R. Norris, of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, of Charleston and C. Mitchell Brown, of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, of Columbia, for Respondent.

This is an appeal from a circuit court order refusing to reform a Florida automobile insurance policy to remove a family member exclusion finding enforcement of that exclusion does not offend South Carolina's public policy.

Burnet Rhett Maybank, III, of Nexsen Pruet, LLC, of Columbia, for Appellant. Milton Gary Kimpson, Adam Nicholas Marinelli and Harry A. Hancock, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

Appellant, a taxpayer that filed consolidated income tax returns for three corporate affiliates that wholly owned the general partnership of Centex Homes, appeals the Administrative Law Court's order denying its claim for infrastructure tax credits for the 2002 to 2005 income tax years. Appellant contends the ALC erred in: (1) concluding the corporate affiliates of Appellant were not eligible to claim the infrastructure tax credit as partners of Centex Homes; (2) its application and interpretation of the aggregate and entity theories of partnership taxation; and (3) concluding that Appellant and its affiliates are not a single taxpayer and may not claim the infrastructure tax credit on its consolidated tax return.

Jean Perrin Derrick, of Lexington, for Appellant. Gary Allen Pickren, of Rogers Townsend & Thomas, PC, of Columbia and Stephan Victor Futeral, of Futeral & Nelson, LLC, of Mt. Pleasant, for Respondents.

This is an appeal from the circuit court's order vacating an arbitration award.